People v. Rice

250 N.E.2d 721, 25 N.Y.2d 822, 303 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1160
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. Although a promise was made to defendant McAuliffe that the other counts and the separate felony indictment be dismissed, such a dismissal stands only as a part of an entire plea arrangement. If the arrangement be undone then the People and the defendant are entitled to be restored to the status obtaining before the plea. On this view it makes no difference to defendant whether the other counts are dismissed, or as happened in this case, deemed covered by the plea. Unless the plea is vacated he cannot be tried on the remaining counts of the indictment and the separate indictment.

Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel and Jasen concur.

Judgments affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rice, 250 N.E.2d 721, 25 N.Y.2d 822, 303 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1160 (N.Y. 1969).

250 N.E.2d 721 (People v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bourne
139 A.D.2d 210 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Mackley
71 A.D.2d 1054 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)