People v. Rice
218 N.E.2d 341, 17 N.Y.2d 881, 271 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1287
Opinion
Judgment affirmed.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating. Judges Fuld and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint in the following memorandum: Evidence that defendant uttered the obscenities testified to, whatever other offense or crime it may have estab *882 lished, does not, in our opinion, make out or constitute the crime of endangering the morals of a minor in violation of subdivision 2 of section 483 of the Penal Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rice, 218 N.E.2d 341, 17 N.Y.2d 881, 271 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1287 (N.Y. 1966).
218 N.E.2d 341 (People v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Simmons
699 N.E.2d 417 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Poplaski
162 Misc. 2d 209 (Nassau County District Court, 1994)
People v. Villacis
143 Misc. 2d 568 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
People v. Rios
142 Misc. 2d 357 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1989)
People v. Doe
137 Misc. 2d 582 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1987)
People v. Suarez
133 Misc. 2d 762 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)