People v. Rice
This text of 218 N.E.2d 341 (People v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating. Judges Fuld and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the complaint in the following memorandum: Evidence that defendant uttered the obscenities testified to, whatever other offense or crime it may have estab *882 lished, does not, in our opinion, make out or constitute the crime of endangering the morals of a minor in violation of subdivision 2 of section 483 of the Penal Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 N.E.2d 341, 17 N.Y.2d 881, 271 N.Y.S.2d 307, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rice-ny-1966.