People v. Riccomini

190 P. 1045, 47 Cal. App. 749, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 493
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 26, 1920
DocketCrim. No. 502.
StatusPublished

This text of 190 P. 1045 (People v. Riccomini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Riccomini, 190 P. 1045, 47 Cal. App. 749, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 493 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

HART, J.

The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts in this case were filed in this court on December 27, 1919. The case was regularly placed on the April, 1920, calendar and, when called, counsel for appellants requested and were granted thirty days’ time in which to file an opening brief. Such time having expired without the filing of a brief and no extension of time having been requested or granted, the case is now ordered submitted upon the record.

*750 [1] By an information filed in the superior court by the district attorney of Sacramento County, defendants were charged with having, in September, 1919, entered the store of 0. Morelli, in the city of Sacramento, with intent to commit the crime of larceny. Defendants were jointly tried, the jury found them guilty, and they were sentenced by the court to imprisonment in the state prison.

We have carefully examined the record and are satisfied that there was sufficient evidence to justify the verdict of guilty. The law was correctly stated to the jury by the court and we discover in the record no error prejudicial to the defendants.

The judgment is affirmed.

Nicol, P. J., pro tem., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 P. 1045, 47 Cal. App. 749, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-riccomini-calctapp-1920.