People v. Rhone
This text of 115 A.D.2d 669 (People v. Rhone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Marasco, J.), rendered December 1, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant argues that the testimony of two police officers at his trial impermissibly bolstered the identification testimony of the complaining witness. However, the record clearly indicates that the officers did not testify that the complaining witness made an out-of-court identification. One officer from the White Plains Police Department testified that he had a conversation with the complaining witness, and as a result of that conversation, he received a description and arrested defendant. Nowhere in the officer’s testimony is there a statement that the complainant identified the defendant as a [670]*670perpetrator of the robbery. Similarly, the other officer, from the Greenburgh Police Department, testified that defendant was brought to the police station, and that the complainant gave a statement to another detective. Nowhere in his testimony is there a statement that the complainant identified the defendant as a perpetrator of the robbery (see, People v Brown, 115 AD2d 485). Therefore, defendant’s claims of bolstering are without merit. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 669, 496 N.Y.S.2d 504, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rhone-nyappdiv-1985.