People v. Rhodes
205 N.E.2d 205, 15 N.Y.2d 729, 256 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1655
This text of 205 N.E.2d 205 (People v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Rhodes, 205 N.E.2d 205, 15 N.Y.2d 729, 256 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1655 (N.Y. 1965).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. Choosing the alternative treatment pursuant to sections 243 and 2189-a of the Penal Law is a matter of sound discretion for the sentencing Judge. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fold, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
205 N.E.2d 205, 15 N.Y.2d 729, 256 N.Y.S.2d 941, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rhodes-ny-1965.