People v. Reynolds

57 A.D.3d 336, 870 N.Y.2d 10
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. However, as the People concede, defendant is entitled to a remand for the sole purpose of reconsideration of the length of the term of postrelease supervision (see People v Stanley, 309 AD2d 1254 [2003]). Since the sentencing court characterized the five-year period it imposed as “mandatory,” it may not have realized that it had the discretion to impose a postrelease supervision term of as little as 21/2 years (Penal Law § 70.45 [2] [f]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Tom, Buckley, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reynolds, 57 A.D.3d 336, 870 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

57 A.D.3d 336 (People v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Britt
67 A.D.3d 1023 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)