People v. Reynolds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Reynolds

4 A.D.3d 490, 771 N.Y.S.2d 677

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 490 (People v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Reynolds, 4 A.D.3d 490, 771 N.Y.S.2d 677 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered October 9, 2002, convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]). Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw her plea without conducting a hearing or assigning new counsel (see People v Anderson, 284 AD2d 544, 545 [2001]). The defendant’s reliance on People v Wilson (15 NY2d 634 [1964]) is misplaced in that the basis for denying the defendant’s motion appears on the face of the record of her plea allocation. Ritter, J.E, S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), rendered October 9, 2002, convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]). Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw her plea without conducting a hearing or assigning new counsel (see People v Anderson, 284 AD2d 544, 545 [2001]). The defendant’s reliance on People v Wilson (15 NY2d 634 [1964]) is misplaced in that the basis for denying the defendant’s motion appears on the face of the record of her plea allocation. Ritter, J.E, S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 490, 771 N.Y.S.2d 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reynolds-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack