People v. Reynolds

199 A.D.2d 287, 605 N.Y.S.2d 953
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reynolds. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 A.D.2d 883

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Herold, J.), rendered December 9,1991, convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We also find that the sentencing court did not err in directing the defendant to make restitution in the amount of $6,000 (see, Penal Law § 60.27 [2]). Under the circumstances, the record before the court was sufficient to support a finding as to the appropriate amount of restitution (see, People v Turco, 130 AD2d 785). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Balletta and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reynolds, 199 A.D.2d 287, 605 N.Y.S.2d 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 287 (People v. Reynolds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Turco
130 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)