People v. Reynolds

California Court of Appeal

People v. Reynolds

28 Cal. App. 109

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 20, 1915

DocketCrim. No. 317

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cal. App. 109 (People v. Reynolds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Reynolds, 28 Cal. App. 109 (Cal. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of “assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature.” He moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying him a new trial. The evidence in the ease is unprintable, but was, we think, sufficient to show that there was an assault within the meaning of section 240 of the Penal Code, defining an assault, and of section 220, under which the defendant was prosecuted. We discover no error in the instructions given or refused.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of “assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature.” He moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying him a new trial. The evidence in the ease is unprintable, but was, we think, sufficient to show that there was an assault within the meaning of section 240 of the Penal Code, defining an assault, and of section 220, under which the defendant was prosecuted. We discover no error in the instructions given or refused.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Cal. App. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reynolds-calctapp-1915.