People v. Reyes

2021 NY Slip Op 04459, 147 N.Y.S.3d 900, 196 A.D.3d 1171
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 16, 2021
Docket562 KA 18-01874
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 04459 (People v. Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Reyes, 2021 NY Slip Op 04459, 147 N.Y.S.3d 900, 196 A.D.3d 1171 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Reyes (2021 NY Slip Op 04459)
People v Reyes
2021 NY Slip Op 04459
Decided on July 16, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 16, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

562 KA 18-01874

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ANGEL REYES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (SHERRY A. CHASE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DANIEL J. PUNCH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (James F. Bargnesi, J.), rendered May 16, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and criminal mischief in the fourth degree (§ 145.00 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable and that his felony conviction should be reduced to a misdemeanor because County Court abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to continue participating in the judicial diversion program following an arrest on new felony charges. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable (see People v Love, 181 AD3d 1193, 1193 [4th Dept 2020]), we perceive no abuse of discretion by the court (see People v Secore, 102 AD3d 1059, 1060 [3d Dept 2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1019 [2013]). In any event, under these circumstances, there is no legal basis for us to reduce the felony conviction to a misdemeanor, as defendant requests.

Entered: July 16, 2021

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Secore
102 A.D.3d 1059 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 04459, 147 N.Y.S.3d 900, 196 A.D.3d 1171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reyes-nyappdiv-2021.