People v. Reyes
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered June 1, 2010, convicting him of criminal sexual act in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in precluding him from offering expert testimony in support of his contention that he *848 could not have written an alleged handwritten confession because he was illiterate (see People v Lemery, 107 AD3d 1593, 1594 [2013]; People v White, 75 AD3d 109, 124 [2010]; see generally People v Williams, 20 NY3d 579, 583-584 [2013]; People v Lee, 96 NY2d 157, 162 [2001]). Evaluation of the defendant’s claim that he was illiterate was not beyond the ken of the typical juror (see People v Lemery, 107 AD3d at 1594; People v White, 75 AD3d at 124). Balkin, J.P., Austin, Miller and Maltese, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
130 A.D.3d 847 (People v. Reyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.