People v. Reyes
This text of 301 A.D.2d 540 (People v. Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered April 3, 1998, as amended April 6, 1998, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly denied his request for a missing witness charge concerning an eyewitness. The defendant failed to establish that the uncalled witness was expected to testify favorably for the prosecution (see People v Jones, 294 AD2d 517). Moreover, the uncalled eyewitness’s testimony would merely have been cumulative (see People v Walker, 250 AD2d 868).
[541]*541The Supreme Court properly imposed consecutive sentences for the defendant’s convictions of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (see People v Mack, 242 AD2d 543).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 A.D.2d 540, 752 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reyes-nyappdiv-2003.