People v. Reyes

288 A.D.2d 401, 734 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11241
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reyes. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 261

Opinion

—Appeal by the People, as limited by their brief, [402]*402from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated June 15, 2000, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

Under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials (see, People v Oramus, 25 NY2d 825). O’Brien, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reyes, 288 A.D.2d 401, 734 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 401 (People v. Reyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Oramus
250 N.E.2d 723 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)