People v. Reyes

273 A.D.2d 127, 710 N.Y.S.2d 887, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7112
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reyes. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 261

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered July 30, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree and conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 25 years to life, SVs to 25 years and SVs to 25 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that he was denied effective, assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to join in his purported pro se motion to withdraw his plea cannot be reviewed on this appeal since it is based on facts dehors the record. The existing record does not establish the grounds of the motion, or even that there was such a motion pending before the court at the time of sentencing. Based on the record before us, we find that the defendant was provided with meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714).

Defendant was not entitled to a hearing on his conclusory, unsupported assertions with respect to the plea agreement.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Ellerin, Lerner, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reyes, 273 A.D.2d 127, 710 N.Y.S.2d 887, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 127 (People v. Reyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)