People v. Retallack

118 A.D.3d 732, 986 N.Y.S.2d 862
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 2014·No. 2013-01017·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Warhit, J.), rendered December 18, 2012, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 530.45 (6).

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

Dillon, J.E, Dickerson, Cohen and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Retallack, 118 A.D.3d 732, 986 N.Y.S.2d 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

118 A.D.3d 732 (People v. Retallack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mateo
811 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)