People v. Republic Savings & Loan Ass'n

119 A.D. 502, 104 N.Y.S. 1136, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3183
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Jenks, J.:

We should, not disturb the order. If the receivers have heretofore accounted in other jurisdictions, the order- would not preclude the receivers from reading decrees therein settling” such accounts, which, if valid, w’ould protect them herein and would halt any investigation in- transactions validated by such decrees. Further, if the receivers are protected against ancillary or collateral proceed- ■ ings by- orders of validity final in their character, this order cannot be used to. question or to attack such , adjudications. ■ These questions can all be presented to the referee and should be passed upon by him.

The order is affirmed, without costsi

Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Order, affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Republic Savings & Loan Ass'n, 119 A.D. 502, 104 N.Y.S. 1136, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

119 A.D. 502 (People v. Republic Savings & Loan Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strauss v. Casey Machine and Supply Co.
68 Misc. 474 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)