People v. Renner
209 N.E.2d 121, 16 N.Y.2d 645, 261 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1337
This text of 209 N.E.2d 121 (People v. Renner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Renner, 209 N.E.2d 121, 16 N.Y.2d 645, 261 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1337 (N.Y. 1965).
Opinion
Order modified to the extent of dismissing the fourth count of the indictment upon the ground that there is insufficient proof to establish that defendant actually practiced medicine in violation of subdivision 1 of section 6513 of the Education Law and, as so modified, affirmed. No opinion.
Concur; Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Graham
331 N.E.2d 673 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 N.E.2d 121, 16 N.Y.2d 645, 261 N.Y.S.2d 81, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-renner-ny-1965.