People v. Rendon
This text of 208 A.D.2d 869 (People v. Rendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), imposed June 7, 1993.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
We find that the defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal his sentence is not valid (see, People v Pressley, 202 AD2d 695; People v Markland, 183 AD2d 788; see generally, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).
We have examined the defendant’s contention that his sentence is excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, O’Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 A.D.2d 869, 618 N.Y.S.2d 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rendon-nyappdiv-1994.