People v. Rendon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rendon

208 A.D.2d 869, 618 N.Y.S.2d 554

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 24, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), imposed June 7, 1993.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal his sentence is not valid (see, People v Pressley, 202 AD2d 695; People v Markland, 183 AD2d 788; see generally, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).

We have examined the defendant’s contention that his sentence is excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, O’Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), imposed June 7, 1993.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

We find that the defendant’s purported waiver of the right to appeal his sentence is not valid (see, People v Pressley, 202 AD2d 695; People v Markland, 183 AD2d 788; see generally, People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).

We have examined the defendant’s contention that his sentence is excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan, O’Brien and Hart, JJ., concur.

People v. Rendon, 208 A.D.2d 869, 618 N.Y.S.2d 554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

208 A.D.2d 869 (People v. Rendon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related