People v. Remington
This text of 38 A.D.2d 882 (People v. Remington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although we find that errors were committed in the course of the trial, we note that “ Errors are almost inevitable in any trial, improprieties almost unavoidable, but the presence of one or the other furnishes no automatic signal for reversal and retrial ” (People v. Kingston, 8 N Y 2d 384, 387); and this is true even with respect to some constitutional errors (Chapman v. California, 386 U. S. 18, 22). We are directed to determine appeals without regard to technical errors which do not affect substantial rights (Code Crim. Pro., § 542; CPL 470.05, subd. 1). We conclude that the errors in this record did not affect defendant’s substantial rights and that he received a fair trial. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of murder.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Witmer, Moule, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A.D.2d 882, 329 N.Y.S.2d 315, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-remington-nyappdiv-1972.