People v. Rembert

52 A.D.3d 537, 860 N.Y.S.2d 123
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.3d 537 (People v. Rembert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rembert, 52 A.D.3d 537, 860 N.Y.S.2d 123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered July 7, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, criminal trespass in the second degree, and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[538]*538Upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury on the defense of justification is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the trial court properly denied the defendant’s request for a justification charge since no reasonable view of the evidence supported such a charge (see People v Cox, 92 NY2d 1002 [1998]).

The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial. Any prejudice to the defendant that might have resulted from the testimony of the prosecution’s witness was alleviated by the trial court’s prompt curative instructions to the jury (see People v Brescia, 41 AD3d 613 [2007]; People v Smith, 23 AD3d 415 [2005]; People v Boston, 296 AD2d 576, 577 [2002]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513, 519 [1983]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P, Spolzino, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mendez
85 A.D.3d 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.3d 537, 860 N.Y.S.2d 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rembert-nyappdiv-2008.