People v. Reising

106 A.D.2d 522, 483 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21565
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.), imposed November 28, 1983, upon his plea of guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, the sentence being four years to life imprisonment.

Sentence affirmed.

[523] Whether a continuance should be granted rests in the discretion of the Trial Judge (e.g., People v Cable, 63 NY2d 270) and on this record, we cannot say that it was an improvident exercise of discretion to refuse to adjourn sentencing for two weeks (see People v Sprow, 104 AD2d 1056; People v Matta, 103 AD2d 756). The sentence imposed was in accordance with the bargained plea and appellate modification is not warranted (cf. People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Titone, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reising, 106 A.D.2d 522, 483 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21565 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

106 A.D.2d 522 (People v. Reising) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mitchell
184 A.D.2d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Arroyo
124 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)