People v. Reiner
This text of 29 A.D.2d 878 (People v. Reiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by respondent to dismiss appeal from so much of an order of the County Court, Westchester County, as denied defendant’s motion to vacate a wiretap order and to enjoin the People from using the fruits of the wiretap order. Motion granted; appeal dismissed. A wiretap order is “a proper subject of judicial review in the same manner and to the limited extent permitted with respect to a warrant for search and seizure” {People v Cohen, 24 A D 2d 900, affd. 18 N Y 2d 650). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 A.D.2d 878, 288 N.Y.S.2d 432, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reiner-nyappdiv-1968.