People v. Rein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rein

213 A.D.2d 683, 624 N.Y.S.2d 939

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 27, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 683 (People v. Rein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rein, 213 A.D.2d 683, 624 N.Y.S.2d 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), all rendered December 6, 1993, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a felony under Indictment No. 1064/87, bail jumping in the second degree under Indictment No. 477/88, [684]*684and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a felony under Indictment No. 699/88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). We additionally conclude that the defendant has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), all rendered December 6, 1993, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a felony under Indictment No. 1064/87, bail jumping in the second degree under Indictment No. 477/88, [684]*684and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as a felony under Indictment No. 699/88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). We additionally conclude that the defendant has failed to raise any nonfrivolous issues in his pro se supplemental brief. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 683, 624 N.Y.S.2d 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rein-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack