People v. Reily

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Reily

51 A.D.3d 824, 856 N.Y.S.2d 864

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error co-ram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 20, 2004 (People v Reily, 13 AD3d 560 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 12, 2001.

[825] Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the appellant for a writ of error co-ram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 20, 2004 (People v Reily, 13 AD3d 560 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 12, 2001.

[825] Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera and Ritter, JJ., concur.

People v. Reily, 51 A.D.3d 824, 856 N.Y.S.2d 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

51 A.D.3d 824 (People v. Reily) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related