People v. Reid

19 A.D.3d 279, 796 N.Y.S.2d 920
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reid. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 A.D.3d 1215

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J), rendered April 1, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the DNA databank fee, and otherwise affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant from calling witnesses to corroborate his own testimony as to his economic status and his reason for being in the neighborhood where the sale occurred, since neither matter was a material issue at trial. The court’s ruling had no adverse impact on defendant’s right to present a defense (see Crane v Kentucky, 476 US 683, 689-690 [1986]).

As the People concede, since the crime was committed prior to the effective date of the legislation (Penal Law § 60.35 [1] [a] [v] [former (1) (e)]), that fee should not have been imposed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reid, 19 A.D.3d 279, 796 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

19 A.D.3d 279 (People v. Reid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crane v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 683 (Supreme Court, 1986)