People v. Reid
This text of 251 A.D.2d 430 (People v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered April 11, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s sole contention is that the trial court erred in denying the defense counsel’s challenge for cause of a juror [431]*431whose brother was a police officer. A challenge to a prospective juror on the ground that the juror has a state of mind that is likely to preclude him or her from rendering an impartial verdict should only be granted if there is a substantial risk that the juror’s state of mind will affect his or her ability to discharge his responsibilities, a determination committed to the discretion of the trial court, with its unique opportunities to evaluate the prospective jurors during voir dire (see, People v Williams, 63 NY2d 882; People v Davis, 221 AD2d 653; People v Campbell, 216 AD2d 482). The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defense counsel’s challenge. Sullivan, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 A.D.2d 430, 674 N.Y.S.2d 118, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reid-nyappdiv-1998.