People v. Reichman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Reichman

187 A.D.2d 737, 591 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13400

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D.2d 737 (People v. Reichman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Reichman, 187 A.D.2d 737, 591 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), rendered June 10, 1991, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of 4 Vs to 13 years imprisonment on each conviction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his guilty plea was not entered knowingly and voluntarily because the court did not clearly convey the promised sentence. However, during the plea proceedings, the court, without any ambiguity, informed the defendant that the minimum sentence it would impose would be 2 to 6 years imprisonment and the maximum sentence would be 5 to 15 years imprisonment. Accordingly, the defendant’s contention is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), rendered June 10, 1991, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of 4 Vs to 13 years imprisonment on each conviction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his guilty plea was not entered knowingly and voluntarily because the court did not clearly convey the promised sentence. However, during the plea proceedings, the court, without any ambiguity, informed the defendant that the minimum sentence it would impose would be 2 to 6 years imprisonment and the maximum sentence would be 5 to 15 years imprisonment. Accordingly, the defendant’s contention is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D.2d 737, 591 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reichman-nyappdiv-1992.