People v. Regins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Regins

203 A.D.2d 165, 610 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4136

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.2d 165 (People v. Regins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Regins, 203 A.D.2d 165, 610 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered October 30, 1990, insofar as appealed from, convicting defendant, after a jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the trial court’s Sandoval ruling, which allowed inquiry into the sentence defendant received for a prior conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree, as well as the fact of the conviction itself, was an abuse of discretion is not preserved for review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina, 171 AD2d 559, lv denied 78 NY2d 924), and any event, is without merit (People v Rodena, 170 AD2d 418, 419, lv denied 77 NY2d 966). Concur —Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered October 30, 1990, insofar as appealed from, convicting defendant, after a jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the trial court’s Sandoval ruling, which allowed inquiry into the sentence defendant received for a prior conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree, as well as the fact of the conviction itself, was an abuse of discretion is not preserved for review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Medina, 171 AD2d 559, lv denied 78 NY2d 924), and any event, is without merit (People v Rodena, 170 AD2d 418, 419, lv denied 77 NY2d 966). Concur —Carro, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 A.D.2d 165, 610 N.Y.S.2d 788, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-regins-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack