People v. Reeder
This text of 298 A.D.2d 468 (People v. Reeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), rendered July 15, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in. the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent determinate terms of 15 years imprisonment for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and seven years imprisonment for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing by a different justice.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling was a provident exercise of discretion (see People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455; People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371; People v Cruz, 176 AD2d 751).
However, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing before a different justice. The sentencing court’s remarks demonstrated that it improperly considered crimes of which the defendant was acquitted as a basis for sentencing (see People v Innis, 288 AD2d 236; People v Santiago, 277 AD2d 258). Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
298 A.D.2d 468, 748 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reeder-nyappdiv-2002.