People v. Reed

78 A.D.3d 1534, 910 N.Y.S.2d 400
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 2010·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered January 30, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [former (4)]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in enhancing his sentence based on his arrest between the time of his plea and the time of sentencing. Defendant, however, did not object to the enhanced sentence and did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, and he therefore failed to preserve his contention for our review (see People v Cox, 27 AD3d 1170 [2006], lv denied 6 NY3d 893 [2006]; People v Holmes, 306 AD2d 889 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 621 [2003]). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Reed, 78 A.D.3d 1534, 910 N.Y.S.2d 400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

78 A.D.3d 1534 (People v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WEBB, LATISHA, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Webb
81 A.D.3d 1299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)