People v. Reed
124 A.D.2d 755, 507 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62066
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reed. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 A.D.2d 574 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 1986·Published
Opinion
After viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we conclude that the jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
We have considered the defendant’s other contentions, including those in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be unpreserved and, in any event, without merit. Mangano, J. P., Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Reed, 124 A.D.2d 755, 507 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).
124 A.D.2d 755 (People v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)