People v. Reed

Supreme Court of Colorado

People v. Reed

592 P.2d 806, 197 Colo. 334, 1979 Colo. LEXIS 562

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Reed. Read the opinion of the Court — 190 Colo. 517 →

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 2, 1979·No. No. 28104; No. 28111·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

These appeals were consolidated and considered by this court with MR. JUSTICE ROVIRA not participating. MR. JUSTICE GROVES, MR. JUSTICE LEE, and MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON would affirm the judgments of the trial courts while MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HODGES, MR. JUSTICE PRINGLE, and MR. JUSTICE CARRIGAN would reverse. Because this court, acting en banc, is equally divided in opinion, the judgments of the trial courts stand affirmed by operation of law. C.A.R. 35(e); City and County of Denver v. Board of County Commissioners, 145 Colo. 451, 359 P.2d 1031 (1961).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

These appeals were consolidated and considered by this court with MR. JUSTICE ROVIRA not participating. MR. JUSTICE GROVES, MR. JUSTICE LEE, and MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON would affirm the judgments of the trial courts while MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HODGES, MR. JUSTICE PRINGLE, and MR. JUSTICE CARRIGAN would reverse. Because this court, acting en banc, is equally divided in opinion, the judgments of the trial courts stand affirmed by operation of law. C.A.R. 35(e); City and County of Denver v. Board of County Commissioners, 145 Colo. 451, 359 P.2d 1031 (1961).

People v. Reed, 592 P.2d 806, 197 Colo. 334, 1979 Colo. LEXIS 562 (Colo. 1979).

Pincite

592 P.2d 806 (People v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related