People v. Redmond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Redmond

187 A.D. 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A.D. 903 (People v. Redmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Redmond, 187 A.D. 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Inasmuch as the court did not pass upon the facts in deciding the appeal, we think that there must now be a reargument of the appeal so far as the facts are concerned; and that we cannot resettle our former order as the motion asks. Therefore, a reargument on the facts is ordered, and case set down for Tuesday, February 25, 1919. We deem this conclusion necessary because two judges who were members of the court which made the decision are no longer members of the court. Present — Jenks, P. J., Putnam, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inasmuch as the court did not pass upon the facts in deciding the appeal, we think that there must now be a reargument of the appeal so far as the facts are concerned; and that we cannot resettle our former order as the motion asks. Therefore, a reargument on the facts is ordered, and case set down for Tuesday, February 25, 1919. We deem this conclusion necessary because two judges who were members of the court which made the decision are no longer members of the court. Present — Jenks, P. J., Putnam, Blackmar, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A.D. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-redmond-nyappdiv-1919.