People v. Redhead (Nicolas)

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 19, 2016·No. 2016 NYSlipOp 50786(U)·Published

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Nicolas Redhead, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered June 13, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered June 13, 2015, reversed, on the law, and the accusatory instrument dismissed.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365-366 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: May 19, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Redhead (Nicolas), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

People v. Redhead (Nicolas) (People v. Redhead (Nicolas)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
People v. Tyrell
4 N.E.3d 346 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)