People v. Redd

81 A.D.3d 751, 916 N.Y.S.2d 522
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 8, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 A.D.3d 751 (People v. Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Redd, 81 A.D.3d 751, 916 N.Y.S.2d 522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered September 23, 2008, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in admitting evidence of the defendant’s flight and in charging the jury that it might infer a consciousness of guilt therefrom. However, although the charge was not warranted under the circumstances of the case, any error in the admission of the flight evidence or in the charge was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, and no significant probability that the error contributed to his conviction (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]; People v Heman, 198 AD2d 434, 435 [1993]; People v Alexander, 164 AD2d 892, 892-893 [1990]).

[752]*752The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Leventhal, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ibarguen
2019 NY Slip Op 5149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D.3d 751, 916 N.Y.S.2d 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-redd-nyappdiv-2011.