People v. Redd
This text of 765 N.W.2d 340 (People v. Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Leave to Appeal Granted May 29, 2009:
The parties shall address whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding: (1) that the trial court abused its discretion when it granted the defendant a new trial; (2) that there was no error in the admission of the police detective’s repeated testimony about the defendant’s failure to deny certain accusations and his act of departing from the police interview, see People v Bigge, 288 Mich 417 (1939); and (3) that the defendant waived any error when defense counsel expressed satisfaction with the trial court’s instructions to the jury. Court of Appeals No. 283934.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
765 N.W.2d 340, 483 Mich. 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-redd-mich-2009.