People v. Reclamation Dist. No. 108

169 Cal. 786
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 5, 1915
DocketSac. No. 2289
StatusPublished

This text of 169 Cal. 786 (People v. Reclamation Dist. No. 108) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Reclamation Dist. No. 108, 169 Cal. 786 (Cal. 1915).

Opinion

THE COURT.

In this action quo warranto instituted by the people of the state of California upon the relation of appellants, the relators alone are attempting to appeal from a judgment for defendant given upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The notice of appeal states that they take the appeal “because they are parties in interest and because the attorney-general declines to take an appeal in the name of the state.” Under our law such an action may be brought and maintained only by the attorney-general in the name of the people of the state, and the relators are not “parties” to the action. An attempt to appeal by them alone is necessarily ineffectual for any purpose.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 Cal. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reclamation-dist-no-108-cal-1915.