People v. Rebolini

201 A.D.2d 591, 609 N.Y.S.2d 804

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered April 2, 1992, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We find that the sentence imposed was not excessive.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rebolini, 201 A.D.2d 591, 609 N.Y.S.2d 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 591 (People v. Rebolini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)