People v. Real

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Real

273 A.D.2d 129, 710 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7174

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 129 (People v. Real) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Real, 273 A.D.2d 129, 710 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7174 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered January 30, 1997, as amended March 5, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2V4 to 4V2 years, and judgment, same court and Justice, rendered January 30, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of violation of probation, and sentencing him to a concurrent term of 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Credibility and identification issues were properly presented to the jury and there is no basis upon which to disturb its findings. Concur— Williams, J. P., Tom, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered January 30, 1997, as amended March 5, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2V4 to 4V2 years, and judgment, same court and Justice, rendered January 30, 1997, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of violation of probation, and sentencing him to a concurrent term of 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Credibility and identification issues were properly presented to the jury and there is no basis upon which to disturb its findings. Concur— Williams, J. P., Tom, Rubin and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.D.2d 129, 710 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-real-nyappdiv-2000.