People v. Reade

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Reade

272 N.E.2d 481, 29 N.Y.2d 493, 323 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1227

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 9, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 N.E.2d 481 (People v. Reade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Reade, 272 N.E.2d 481, 29 N.Y.2d 493, 323 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1227 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered in the following memorandum: The failure of the trial court to assist the defendant, who was defending pro se, in producing at the trial the person to whom the defendant initially confessed, was, as the District Attorney most commendably acknowledges, error justifying reversal (People v. Wells, 272 N. Y. 215).

Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered in the following memorandum: The failure of the trial court to assist the defendant, who was defending pro se, in producing at the trial the person to whom the defendant initially confessed, was, as the District Attorney most commendably acknowledges, error justifying reversal (People v. Wells, 272 N. Y. 215).

Concur: Chief Judge Full and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 N.E.2d 481, 29 N.Y.2d 493, 323 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-reade-ny-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack