People v. Rayola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rayola

92 A.D.2d 942, 460 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17359

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 92 A.D.2d 942 (People v. Rayola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rayola, 92 A.D.2d 942, 460 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17359 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

•— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.), rendered April 6,1982, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a definite prison term of six months. Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed and matter remanded to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. At the time defendant entered his guilty plea, the court indicated that it would impose a sentence of probation if defendant made restitution. The court failed to fix an amount of restitution. Accordingly, the sentencing court, upon remand, shall impose a sentence of probation and fix the appropriate amount of restitution and a date for its payment. Only if restitution is not made may a prison term be imposed (Penal Law, § 65.10, subd 2, par [g]). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

•— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Sherman, J.), rendered April 6,1982, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a definite prison term of six months. Judgment modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed. As so modified, judgment affirmed and matter remanded to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. At the time defendant entered his guilty plea, the court indicated that it would impose a sentence of probation if defendant made restitution. The court failed to fix an amount of restitution. Accordingly, the sentencing court, upon remand, shall impose a sentence of probation and fix the appropriate amount of restitution and a date for its payment. Only if restitution is not made may a prison term be imposed (Penal Law, § 65.10, subd 2, par [g]). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.2d 942, 460 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rayola-nyappdiv-1983.