People v. Raymond-Barnes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Raymond-Barnes

82 A.D.2d 866, 441 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14554

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 A.D.2d 866 (People v. Raymond-Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Raymond-Barnes, 82 A.D.2d 866, 441 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Tsoucalas, J.), rendered November 2,1978, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Case remitted to Criminal Term to hear and report on the issue of whether the defendant was deprived of his right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.20), and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term shall file its report with all convenient speed. In the instant case, there was an 18-month delay between indictment and trial. Approximately 13 months after the indictment, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds, but no hearing was held, nor was any determination made with respect to that motion. The record is insufficient to permit us to review the merits of defendant’s claim. Therefore, we must remit for a hearing. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Tsoucalas, J.), rendered November 2,1978, convicting him of murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Case remitted to Criminal Term to hear and report on the issue of whether the defendant was deprived of his right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.20), and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. Criminal Term shall file its report with all convenient speed. In the instant case, there was an 18-month delay between indictment and trial. Approximately 13 months after the indictment, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds, but no hearing was held, nor was any determination made with respect to that motion. The record is insufficient to permit us to review the merits of defendant’s claim. Therefore, we must remit for a hearing. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Hargett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 866, 441 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-raymond-barnes-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack