People v. Rayford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rayford

174 A.D.2d 988, 573 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8899

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rayford. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 A.D.2d 482 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 1991·Published

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the court erred in its charge on intoxication. The charge, when viewed in its entirety, did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof to defendant (see, People v Lynch, 23 NY2d 262, 268-270). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the court erred in its charge on intoxication. The charge, when viewed in its entirety, did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof to defendant (see, People v Lynch, 23 NY2d 262, 268-270). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

People v. Rayford, 174 A.D.2d 988, 573 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

174 A.D.2d 988 (People v. Rayford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related