People v. Ray
This text of 194 N.W.2d 24 (People v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion. After trial by the court sitting without a jury, the defendant was convicted of assault with intent to commit rape. MCLA § 750.85 (Stat Ann 1962 Bev § 28.280). On appeal, he claims that the trial court’s acceptance of his waiver of jury trial was inadequate and that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence; the people have filed a motion to affirm.
After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 N.W.2d 24, 36 Mich. App. 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ray-michctapp-1971.