People v. Rawlings

160 A.D.2d 743
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rawlings. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 A.D.2d 500

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered May 3, 1985, convicting her of attempted assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

Further, we find the court did not err in requiring the defendant, upon her application to reopen the Sandoval hearing, to proffer the specific bad acts which she sought precluded, before it would rule on the propriety of their use for impeachment purposes in the event that she took the stand (see, People v Mathews, 68 NY2d 118; People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rawlings, 160 A.D.2d 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

160 A.D.2d 743 (People v. Rawlings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Matthews
497 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)