Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Rattler

People v. Rattler

68 A.D.3d 788, 888 N.Y.2d 896
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 1, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 68 A.D.3d 788 (People v. Rattler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Rattler, 68 A.D.3d 788, 888 N.Y.2d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of [789]*789guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 788, 888 N.Y.2d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rattler-nyappdiv-2009.