People v. Ratliff
This text of 745 N.W.2d 762 (People v. Ratliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Lonnie Roberts RATLIFF, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 13, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the sentence of the Manistee Circuit Court and REMAND this case to the trial court for resentencing. The trial court's assumption that the defendant would be required to serve additional prison time on his parole sentence before serving the instant sentence was not objective and verifiable, and in fact was erroneous. Furthermore, the possibility of a current prisoner or parolee serving a sentence in the county jail does not relate to the seriousness of the offense or the culpability of the offender, and is not a compelling reason to deny the defendant an intermediate sanction to which he is entitled by statute. MCL 769.34. On remand, the trial court shall sentence the defendant within the appropriate sentencing guidelines range, or articulate on the record a substantial and compelling reason for departing from the sentencing guidelines range in accordance with People v. Babcock, 469 Mich. 247, 666 N.W.2d 231 (2003). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
745 N.W.2d 762, 480 Mich. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ratliff-mich-2008.