People v. Rarback
This text of 358 N.E.2d 267 (People v. Rarback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. The order at the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Notwithstanding the extended over-all elapsed time, all the circumstances in this somewhat unusual case, including, inter alia, the protracted pendency of appeals in directly related cases involving the admissibility in this case of crucial evidence, properly moved the courts below to conclude that this defendant was not denied his constitutional or statutory right to a speedy trial.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
358 N.E.2d 267, 40 N.Y.2d 922, 389 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rarback-ny-1976.