Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Rarback

People v. Rarback

358 N.E.2d 267, 40 N.Y.2d 922, 389 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3091
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 1976·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order at the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Notwithstanding the extended over-all elapsed time, all the circumstances in this somewhat unusual case, including, inter alia, the protracted pendency of appeals in directly related cases involving the admissibility in this case of crucial evidence, properly moved the courts below to conclude that this defendant was not denied his constitutional or statutory right to a speedy trial.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Rarback, 358 N.E.2d 267, 40 N.Y.2d 922, 389 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 3091 (N.Y. 1976).

358 N.E.2d 267 (People v. Rarback) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Woods
New York Court of Appeals, 2026
People v. Barry
292 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Scott
172 Misc. 2d 594 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1997)
People v. Neal
208 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Green
131 Misc. 2d 641 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Passero
96 A.D.2d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Dean
384 N.E.2d 1277 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Dean
56 A.D.2d 242 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)