People v. Rao

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Rao

45 A.D.2d 958, 359 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 A.D.2d 958 (People v. Rao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Rao, 45 A.D.2d 958, 359 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

By permission, defendants Rao move to dismiss the indictments against them and defendant Nigrone seeks a judgment in the nature of prohibition. The court desires to hear oral argument on said applications. Accordingly, the appliaetions ,are set down for argument before this court on October 23, 1974 at 10:00 a.m. Aside from the other contentions raised by the moving papers, the court desires the parties to be prepared to argue (1) the propriety of the means used by the special prosecutor in initiating the procedures involved in and leading to the indictments and (2) whether a perjury indictment can be sustained when the testimony was given in connection with a crime known by the prosecutor not to have been committed. Any of the parties desiring to do so may submit memoranda in addition to those already served, provided the same be served and filed by October 11, 1974. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By permission, defendants Rao move to dismiss the indictments against them and defendant Nigrone seeks a judgment in the nature of prohibition. The court desires to hear oral argument on said applications. Accordingly, the appliaetions ,are set down for argument before this court on October 23, 1974 at 10:00 a.m. Aside from the other contentions raised by the moving papers, the court desires the parties to be prepared to argue (1) the propriety of the means used by the special prosecutor in initiating the procedures involved in and leading to the indictments and (2) whether a perjury indictment can be sustained when the testimony was given in connection with a crime known by the prosecutor not to have been committed. Any of the parties desiring to do so may submit memoranda in addition to those already served, provided the same be served and filed by October 11, 1974. Shapiro, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Christ, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 958, 359 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-rao-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack