People v. Rankin
151 A.D.2d 1003, 544 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8334
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Rankin. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D.2d 987 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s burglary and larceny convictions are supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495), and the sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive (see, People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305). (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — burglary, second degree; grand larceny, third degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Rankin, 151 A.D.2d 1003, 544 N.Y.S.2d 518, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
151 A.D.2d 1003 (People v. Rankin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)